I pondered editing my original Alien Nine post to include these points but then decided they'd be worth addressing in a stand alone post.
Literary Criticism and Film Interpretation are skills and the practice of them is harder than it looks. The late Zac Bertschy (Founder and Main Host of ANNCast & Senior Editor of Anime News Network) went to film school and was a working journalist. I have two Master's Degrees, a Master of Arts in German Studies from Rice University and a Master of Library Science from the University of North Texas. It's not necessary to have credentials like this to engage in media criticism but they do help. And beyond the work I did for my degrees, I had (and have) an active reading life...philosophy, intellectual history and literary criticism are in regular rotation for my pleasure reading, because I'm a huge nerd.
But life experiences beyond online "CIS-HET White Dude" (c'est moi) also yield unique insights worth listening to, which is why I closely read and appreciated Kathryn K Williams and her OG review of Alien Nine , precisely because of her life experiences as a woman that brought unique perspective to her critical analysis.
But also striking to me was the fierce resistance and hostility her essay apparently provoked at the time, that she ultimately also documents and incorporates into her review. She also discusses the hostility the show itself provoked in some corners of the anime fan community of her time.
Kathryn's original blog is no longer online and what I link to above and in my previous post is the archived version. I have no idea if she's on
Ani-Twitter or even if she watches anime at all anymore, but we are all poorer for it if she isn't and doesn't. The least I can do is do a little boost to her original essay some more.
As she states in her opening paragraph:
"It has been almost a year since a Japanese friend of mine sent me the first episode of Alien 9 to watch. I didn't know at the time what I was walking into, but something about the series struck me from the very beginning. Part of me understood far too well what I was watching which is probably why I continued to watch it. An episode came every month, and slowly I noticed a very deep and dark story evolve. For me, the metaphors were easy to look past."
{...by this I assume Kathryn means the metaphors were easy to "read"/discern, to understand what was really being discussed underneath -JJR}
She continues:
"....While others seem to be stuck on the 'What' and 'Why' of every little detail and just took everything as it was."
{i.e. what we in German Lit Crit call "Das Gesamtkuntswerk" -- the work as a whole -JJR)
Kathryn writes further:
"I'm used to seeing strange things in my dreams so I just looked at Alien 9 in the same way, but I noticed that others who watched the show were left completely lost, or worse, angered by the show. The extreme emotions that were portrayed in the story were making people want to act out violently against the characters in the series. While the beauty of the storytelling moved me while others were spitting and cursing at the screen."
{Sigh angry online Dudebros gonna Dudebro I guess...then as now -JJR}
Kathryn again:
"...For some reason, I felt all their words were aimed at me. Why? Because I'm a child abuse survivor and watching Alien 9 was like looking at myself at that age. Seeing people wanting to hit a child for crying showed me that the world still has a long way to go and in some cases not changed in one bit."
{Sad to say, here in 2021 it's still that shitty -JJR}
She continues:
"...So instead of turning my back I stood up and defended the film. I felt angry, not just because of the violent emotions towards these characters but also because of people's ignorance toward their situation. I couldn't understand why people could not see what for me was in plain black and white."
{They lack the context, the life experience and, shit, basic empathy to relate to tween female protagonists, I'm sad to say. -JJR}
Kathryn:
"...After being asked to do a few discussions on the series, I discovered that it was more then just ignorance that I was dealing with."
{Stage whisper: MISOGYNY -JJR}
Kathryn:
"...Now I sit here writing about how the film affected me, and about all the little things I saw that many were not capable of seeing. Hopefully this paper will help, people will have a clearer look at why I consider this a great film, and why I want more people to see it....[...]... I felt a need for others to see this show. I needed more people to see the pains [sic] we children have suffered behind closed doors, the things that people would rather brush under a carpet. I needed others to see the feelings and pains that no child should have to feel, but still do to this day. The portrayal of their pain and sadness is so real that I hope by having more see it that perhaps they will understand more about what it is like to be a child in these situations. I've found a new cause to stand behind, something that gives me strength."
{I share Kathryn's idealistic belief in the transformative power of ART. I wouldn't do what I do if I didn't. -JJR}
She continues:
"....At first I was upset by others' reactions to this show, but with each person who was angry I noticed others that truly wanted to learn more. This showed me that there was still a small chance for change in this world. When I heard that Central Park Media was bringing not only the Anime but also the Manga to North America, I felt something I couldn't explain. Soon more people will be able to see the film that touched me. Soon more people will understand which is why I'm writing this now. Even if it is a small difference, if only one person is affected by the show then that is enough. To make them more aware that the world isn't as bright and rosy as we are lead to think. So here I stand, supporting a film that most would consider just another insane story. Hopefully after reading this some of you will understand why I am supporting this film, and what it is that made this Anime so special in my mind."
It is a special series and worth remembering and still worth watching in 2021 and beyond.
But since Kathryn was a woman online circa 2000 with opinions, she naturally got a lot of, ahem, feedback, which she also documents:
"....Okay since writing this paper I've gotten a lot of e-mail. Thank you to all of those who support me and your kind words. Now there are a few who had other views and wanted to know what further justification I had for my points. Instead of updating the essay itself I'd decided just to add a FAQ section. Hopefully it will be able to add some further insight into my reasoning.
Q: What makes you think that Yuri was Raped? There is nothing sexual about the anything in A9."
Ooof. These are people who are being far FAR too literal in their understanding of media, or who refuse to understand or acknowledge the function of metaphor & symbolism in ART.
Literalism in art (and art criticism) is an ongoing problem and there was an excellent panel discussion led by Aisling McRea and her fellow Current Affairs writers & staffers. It was a follow up to Aisling McRea's excellent article in Current Affairs (Nov/Dec 2020 issue) on the continuing relevance of the so-called Satanic Panic. The full article was headlined Satanic Panics and the Death of Mythos.
"Nothing Sexual in A9"....even as a middle aged CIS-HET white dude I'm slapping my forehead and saying "REALLY, DUDE? Come the f*ck on!"
However, I can't definitively say that late 20s me would've "gotten it"....I hope so, but I'm just grateful that 50-something me gets it now.
Kathryn provides a response as a kind of "FAQ addendum" to her main essay.
"A: Okay, I've heard a few people who think I'm wrong about the whole rape thing and feel that because of being a rape survivor, I am seeing things that are not there."
Wow. I'm so sorry that happened to you Kathryn and moreover, to the Dudebros of the early aughts doing this kind of shitty gaslighty dismissal, a hearty FUCK YOU. That's an awful thing to say. Kathryn sees what she sees. Who fuckin' cares what you guys think? How about you shut up and listen instead of being so insufferably patronizing for once in your lives? Sheesh.
Kathryn continues:
"Here is my point of view.
Either:
- a) The attacks were purely physical
- b) The attacks were sexual.
Now if we take into account that the Aliens on the children's heads are symbols of adolescence then the two views end up looking something like this:
- a) When boys hit puberty they suddenly find themselves having violent tendencies towards girls which leads, in some, to have an urge to kill them.
- b) When Boys hit puberty they start finding themselves having sexual feelings towards girls, which, for a certain small minority, leads them to attempt/commit rape.
Which of these two points of view make the most sense in the context of the rest of the film?"
Eh, I mean EROS/THANATOS are psychologically linked so I don't think it's quite so easy to parse these two as separate and distinct, as a disturbing number of rape victims also become murder victims as well. It's both. I understand Kathryn is trying to validate her reading & interpretation. I agree that it is a valid interpretation, I just don't think this is a particularly strong rebuttal; or rather, it raises the EROS/THANATOS connection in art & psychology that I can't just brush past without commenting on it, because it's a Big Honking Deal(tm) .
Kathryn summarizes:
"Now for some more details concerning Yuri's rape. The boys' symbol of adulthood pierces the girl's symbol of adulthood. That's not to mention the inside of the girl's borgu looking, to some, like a placenta, the orientation, motion, and nature of the drills from the boys' aliens, and the nightmares in which Yuri finds herself shivering in the middle of a pool nude and crying, not to mention the nature and focus of the flashbacks Yuri experiences. All these point to a sexual attack than a [merely] physical one and there for more a symbol of her being raped."
{Yep. -JJR}
Kathyrn:
"...Regardless of whether you feel the attack is sexual, one point remains. In one form or another, that scene is a very violent and strong depiction of violence of men towards women."
{Yes, 100%. -JJR}
Like yes, what's depicted on screen is a fantastical science fiction battle of alien vs alien....they don't literally pin Yuri down and put their actual penises in her. But that's what the symbolism is telling the thoughtful and reflective viewer actually happened. They gang raped her. Sheesh, you clods watch too much goddamn hentai if you're just not getting that. Kathryn is right on the money with this one.
Anyway, I just really appreciated Kathryn's original essay and wanted to respond in solidarity to these reader/reception points that she alluded to at the time she wrote it and shortly thereafter with her FAQ addendum. Plus I'm sad to say in the world of Twitter (which didn't really exist in 2001-2002), you know the harassment directed at a woman like Kathryn commenting on a popular anime with this take would be 1000% worse. Or heck, just the comment forums of Anime News Network and other Ani-Fandom spaces.
I'm reminded of the plot of Perfect Blue and the then online harassment suffered by the main character then. The old-timey internet depicted in that film does make me smirk with amusement at first, but it's really not that hard of an intellectual exercise to "translate" those scenes to modern day equivalents in the 2020s and imagine what kind of shit actual Pop Idols deal with now on Twitter and other online spaces. Misogyny is still a problem, y'all.
Recent Comments